1) Brea M. Heidelberg. Cultural Trends 28:5, 391-403. “Evaluating equity: assessing diversity efforts through a social justice lens.” 2019. United Kingdom. This paper provides a formative evaluation of The Art Institute of Chicago’s initial efforts to diversify the museum field through the Diversifying Art Museum Leadership Initiative (DAMLI) programme.
2) Jeremy Vachet. Cultural Trends 26:3, 272-274. “Creative justice: cultural industries, work and inequality.” 2017. Ireland. Book review of “Creative Justice,” an account of the need to give justice to culture by Mark Banks, Professor in the Department of Media and Communication at the University of Leicester.
3) Heather Carey, Rebecca Florisson, Dave O Brien, and Neil Lee. Creative Industries Policy & Evidence Center. “Getting in and getting on: Class, participation and job quality in the UK creative industries.” 2020. United Kingdom. Prior to the pandemic, there were growing concerns that the opportunities created in the creative economy were ‘out of reach’ for many. This paper represents the first phase of the PEC’s Policy Review Series on Class in the Creative Industries.
4) Arts Emergency, Orian Brook, Mark Taylor, and David O’Brien. Create London. “Panic! Social class, taste and inequalities in the creative sector.” 2019. United Kingdom. This report demonstrates that the creative industries are marked by significant inequalities. It looks at the social class background of the workforce and how this intersects with other issues.
5) Emily Matchar. Smithsonian Magazine. “Does Creativity Breed Inequality in Cities?” 2017. United States. Interview with Richard Florida on his book “The New Urban Crisis.”
6) Aline Moch Islas, Casey Moser, Shomya Tripathy, and Louie Tan Vital. University of Washington. “Assessing the Creative Economy of Seattle through a Racial & Equity Lens.” 2019. United States. This report lays out policy options to mitigate racial disparities in the creative economy in Seattle.
1. Steven Hadley, Patrick Collins and Maria O’Brien. Cultural Trends 29:2, 145-159. “Culture 2025 A National Cultural Policy Framework for Ireland.” 2020. Ireland. Published in January 2020, Culture 2025 A National Cultural Policy Framework for Ireland is the first single national cultural policy in Ireland since the formation of the Irish State in 1922.
2. Bethany Rex. Cultural Trends 29:2, 129-144. “Roses for everyone? Arts Council England’s 2020–2030 Strategy.” 2020. United Kingdom. In this review article, Rex critically reflects on the ambitions set out in Arts Council England’s 10-year strategy “Let’s Create”.
3. Arts Council England. “Let’s Create: Strategy 2020-2030.” 2020. United Kingdom. This report is a cultural plan from Arts Council England with a vision of the creative landscape of the United Kingdom for 2020-2030.
4. Government of South Australia. “Arts & Culture Plan South Australia, 2019 – 2024.” Australia. 2019. Following extensive community and industry consultation, the Arts and Culture Plan South Australia 2019-2024 was developed to guide the growth of and investment in the state’s leadership in the arts and cultural sector.
5. The Department of Culture Heritage and the Gaeltacht. Government of Ireland. “Culture 2025: A National Cultural Policy Framework to 2025.” 2020. Ireland. This document sets out an overarching vision and framework for the future of culture in Ireland and outlines the plans for action over the coming years.
6. Arts Council of Ireland. “Making Great Art Work: Leading the Development of the Arts in Ireland.” 2016 Ireland. This plan describes the investment strategies, projects and programmes Arts Council will prioritise during 2017–2019 and sets out the achievements and milestones we have set ourselves over this period.
7. National Endowment for the Arts. “Strategic Plan FY 2018-2022.” 2018. United States. A strategic plan from the National Endowment for the Arts for fiscal years 2018-2020.
8. New England Foundation for the Arts. “Strategic Plan 2018-2021.” 2017. United States. In February 2017, the New England Foundation for the Arts crafted a three-year plan that is both comprehensive and adaptable to changing conditions.
This article argues that policy relevance and influence represent legitimate goals of critical research, which does not necessarily mean accepting the pressures and restrictions of arts advocacy and lobbying, or the relinquishing research excellence.
In this platform, the U.S. Department of Arts and Culture describes ten ways to advance toward cultural democracy, a social order which embodies and affirms the right to culture in every aspect of our public and private policies.
The Cultural Plan establishes a framework to inclusively grow the District’s cultural community informed by the Office of Planning’s experience in community development, land use, systems planning, public facilities and infrastructure
A growing number of Indigenous artists are sharing their significant stories through artistic mediums. The Department of Culture and the Arts supports this sector as part of its vision for a community enriched by unique and transforming arts and culture.
Cultural researchers, arts agencies, arts organizations, and artists around the globe are grappling with the COVID-19 crisis, how it is affecting the arts field now, and how it will change the future of the field. As an international forum for cultural research practices, CRN is convening the collective brain power of the network to discuss topics relevant to the crisis. Objectives for this conversation are to allow for shared learning, to understand challenges, to share relevant research, and to provide ideas for future research.
This session explored how cultural research and data sources can help public arts agencies make the case for equitable, sustained cultural funding in the post-COVID-19 economy. What do we know now, where are gaps in knowledge, what do we need to track during/post COVID, to what extent are arts inequities unique and/or reflect larger systems? How is DEI prioritized in COVID-related arts policy responses, and to what ends?
The session was moderated by David Pankratz (Creative Sector Research). Holly Sidford (Helicon Collaborative), Pam Breaux (National Assembly of State Arts Agencies) will join David and attendees in bringing their perspectives and questions to the conversation as discussants.
Akonadi Foundation/Kenneth Rainin Foundation, “Mapping Small Arts and Culture Organizations of Color in Oakland,” 2018
Nonprofit AF/Vu Le, “The Curb-cut Effect and READI,” 2020
Greater Pittsburgh Arts Council, “Racial Equity and Arts Funding: Executive Summary,” 2018
Panel Bios
Pam Beaux joined the National Assembly of State Arts Agencies (NASAA) in 2015. As president and CEO, she works with the association’s board of directors and staff to advance NASAA’s policy and programmatic mission to strengthen America’s state and jurisdictional arts agencies. A native of Lafayette, Louisiana, Pam has held leadership positions at the local, state and national levels. While in Louisiana state government, she was secretary of the Louisiana Department of Culture, Recreation and Tourism (CRT), assistant secretary of CRT (overseeing its cultural development portfolio), and executive director of its state arts agency (the Louisiana Division of the Arts). During her time at CRT, Pam developed and led Louisiana’s cultural economy initiative and spearheaded the successful UNESCO inscription of Poverty Point State Historic Site (an ancient Indian site) as a World Heritage site.
David Pankratz retired recently as Research & Policy Director for the Greater Pittsburgh Arts Council after a 35-year career in research and evaluation in arts policy, advocacy, and management. Topics of recent research are racial equity and arts funding, impacts of the arts, and individual artists, while his co-edited books include The Arts in a New Millennium. David also held senior positions for EmcArts, The Independent Commission on the NEA, and the J. Paul Getty Trust. He has taught for Carnegie Mellon University and earned his Ph.D. in Arts Policy and Administration from The Ohio State University.
Holly Sidford is Co-Director of Helicon Collaborative, a national consulting firm that works with artists, cultural organizations, foundations and other creative enterprises to make communities better places for all people – more vital, adaptive and just. Helicon focuses on three themes central to healthy communities: equity, sustainability and beauty. Holly has 30 years’ experience leading cultural and philanthropic organizations and is nationally recognized for her work in expanding access to arts and culture, enhancing support for artists, and building organizations’ strategic capacity. Before starting Helicon, Holly was the founding President of Leveraging Investments in Creativity (LINC), a ten-year national initiative to improve support systems for artists. She has held leadership positions at Ford Foundation, The Howard Gilman Foundation, New England Foundation for the Arts and Massachusetts Council on the Arts and Humanities.
Are we ready to face the global challenge of Covid-19 pandemic outbreak? Do we know how microbes, migration and metropolises cohabitate or relate to each other? Can we tap into the artistic and cultural creativity to better understand the global infectious diseases or even investigate how they travel across urban and human borders?
The VSG discussed these questions in a live conversation with artists, curators, researchers and cultural producers of the Contagious Cities. This international cultural project was developed by Wellcome Trust in 2018 to mark the centenary of the 1918 flu pandemic that infected a third of the world’s population and killed 50 million people. The VSG will share important insights from the Contagious Cities project, that brought together international curators, artists and scientists through residences across New York, Hong Kong and Geneva to explore how epidemics spread in urban environments.
What do we hope to achieve?
The VSG aims to inform and educate a wider community of cultural researchers, artists, academics and creative workers on the key questions of pandemic diseases to share support and solidarity in the midst of the global spread of the Covid-19. It intends to expose and promote a creative and artistic intake on the crucial issues of the pandemic physical, social and cultural impacts upon urban communities.
The Panelists
Moderator: Dr Natalia Grincheva
Ken Arnold – Creative Director at Wellcome (London, UK)
Sarah Henry – Chief Curator and Deputy Director at the Museum of the City of New York (New York, USA)
Ying Kwok – Curator of Contagious Cities: Far Away, Too Close at Tai Kwun Contemporary (Hong Kong, China)
Matt Adams – Co-founder of Blast Theory (London, UK)
Dr James Doeser – Freelance cultural researcher (London, UK)
Ken Arnold – Creative Director at Wellcome (London, UK)
This article describes the phenomenon of cultural districts in the US, reviews some claims made about their impacts, and provides evidence of districts’ effects.
This report analyses the different ways social impact is defined; draws out current good practice, highlighting gaps and challenges; and suggests a framework and principles for future action.
This report was prepared by the California Arts Council to encourage the development of a broad array of authentic and sustainable cultural districts that reflect the breadth and diversity of California’s cultural assets.
This study from Chung Hagen Consulting looks at how to stabilize and expand the Latino Cultural District in San Francisco by synthesizing findings from interviews, focus groups, and community meetings.
Egle Rindzeviciute reviews “Scenescapes,” a book by Daniel Aaron Silver and Terry Nichols Clark that looks at how localities shape social, cultural, and economic lives.
This article looks at how arts participation in the US has been influenced by the imprint of time (early life, socialization, and historical circumstances) on preferences and behavioral patterns.
This report and case studies of illustrative projects help provide a better understanding of how people are engaging in the arts, and of how arts organizations are enabling this involvement. Researchers at WolfBrown investigated active arts participation across the arts sector in the United States, United Kingdom and Australia, learning from more than 100 organizations currently engaging in participatory arts.
Community-arts researcher and advocate Francois Matarasso presents a book on participatory art and community art written from the perspective of engagement.
This concluding evaluation report on the Exploring Engagement Fund offers insights, best practices, and considerations for arts organizations and funders who prioritize engagement, diversity, equity, and inclusion.
1. Yasemin Arikan, Terry Nichols Clark, Douglas S. Noonan, and George Tolley. Cultural Trends, Vol 28 No 5. “The arts, Bohemian scenes, and income.” United States. 2019.
Where and how does arts activity drive neighbourhood revitalization? We explore the impact of arts establishments on income in US zip codes, nationally and across quantiles (from four to seven subgroups) of zip codes stratified by disadvantage (based on income and ethnicity/race). We focus on what is new here: how neighbourhood scenes or the mixes of amenities mediate relationships between the arts and income.
This report shows how art can be used to promote positive neighborhood change, including equity of access to resources and programs, inclusive planning processes and implementation of new strategies to promote inclusivity and maximize economic impact.
The report explores how investing in culture affects seven broad aspects of Australians’ lives: society and place; the economy; innovation; health and wellbeing; education and learning; international engagement and how engaging with creativity builds a strong cultural life across the nation.
This study is the outcome of a pan-Canadian survey of performing arts presenters and festivals, conducted by Hill Strategies Research. It casts a light on a broad range of presenting practices and the magic that they bring into Canadians’ lives.
This research seeks to generate further evidence to support
the notion that arts and culture has the ability to promote and drive positive
economic and social outcomes at a local level and thus contribute effectively
to a place-shaping approach.
This report by Arts and Business aims to provide the basic facts about the market for private giving to the arts in the UK, as well as recommendations on how it can be increased. Given that Arts and Business has since had its funding removed by the Arts Council, it may soon find out for itself how realistic some of its proposals for enhancing private revenues actually are.
America is in a dramatic cultural shift, but evidence suggests that organized philanthropy may be stuck in the past. As the nation becomes more diverse, it is more important than ever to consider whether the fundraising playbook is due for an overhaul.
This report documents the inequities in funding for the arts in the U.S. and laid out the aesthetic, demographic, and economic case for supporting the cultural diversity of our country more equitably.
This article summarizes lessons learned in arts philanthropy by Createquity, as well as recommendations going forward for foundations, government agencies, individual philanthropists, and others providing resources to support the arts.
5. Maurine Knighton and Glyn Northington. Grantmakers in the Arts. “Racial Equity in the Arts.” 2016. United States.
This four-session web conference series explores practices used to advance racial equity in arts grantmaking, specifically focusing on the various practice components of the grant cycle.
This paper discusses a methodology in mixed-methods audience research that attempts to sort, order and categorise different data so that they can be systematically combined and interrogated.
2. Department for Culture, Media, and Sport. “Culture is Digital.” 2018. United Kingdom.
Culture is Digital looks at the way technology can drive audience engagement, boosting the digital capability of cultural organisations and unleashing the creative potential of technology.
The second report in the Digital Culture Survey, a three-year initiative to track digital technology use by arts and cultural organisations in England and the perceived impact of those technologies on marketing, operations, audience development, strategic
A program-level evaluation of the Digital R&D Fund for the Arts, a partnership between Nesta, Arts Council England and the Arts & Humanities, which provided £7 million for collaborations between arts organisations, technology providers, and researchers.